4V-2C Model: A mnemonic view of phenotypes in hemodynamic incoherence
PDF (Spanish)
HTML (Spanish)

Keywords

Sepsis
Shock
phenotypes

Categories

How to Cite

1.
4V-2C Model: A mnemonic view of phenotypes in hemodynamic incoherence. Rev Arg de Ter Int. [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 23 [cited 2026 Jan. 7];42(1). Available from: https://revista.sati.org.ar/index.php/MI/article/view/960
PDF (Spanish)
HTML (Spanish)

References

Hernández G, Teboul JL. Is the macrocirculation really dissociated from the microcirculation in septic shock? Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(10):1621-1624.

Dubin A, Pozo MO, Casabella CA, Pálizas F Jr, Murias G, Moseinco MC, Kanoore Edul VS, Pálizas F, Estenssoro E, Ince C. Increasing arterial blood pressure with norepinephrine does not improve microcirculatory blood flow: a prospective study. Crit Care. 2009;13(3):R92.

Putowski Z, Goldyn M, Pluta MP. Correlation between mean arterial pressure and capillary refill time in patients with septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Intensive Care Med. 2023;38(9):838-846.

Huang L, Huang Q, Ma W, Yang H. Understanding hemodynamic incoherence: mechanisms, phenotypes, and implications for treatment. Shock. 2025;63(3):342-350.

Datta R, Singh S. The endothelium or mitochondrial level therapy: new frontiers in sepsis? Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2025 10:502130.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Jorge Luis Vélez Páez, Esteban Ochoa-Robles