4V-2C Model: A mnemonic view of phenotypes in hemodynamic incoherence

Article Sidebar

PDF (Spanish) HTML (Spanish)
Published: 2025-12-23
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64955/x8gqh193
Keywords:
Sepsis, Shock, phenotypes

Main Article Content

Jorge Luis Vélez Páez
Universidad Central del Ecuador
Esteban Ochoa-Robles
. , Hospital Pablo Arturo Suárez

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 42 (2025): Publicación continua 2025

Section

Cartas al Editor
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The magazine does not retain the reproduction rights (copyright) so the authors can republish their works with the sole mention of the original publication source.

How to Cite

1.
4V-2C Model: A mnemonic view of phenotypes in hemodynamic incoherence. Rev Arg Ter Int. [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 23 [cited 2026 Jan. 27];42. Available from: https://revista.sati.org.ar/index.php/MI/article/view/960

References

Hernández G, Teboul JL. Is the macrocirculation really dissociated from the microcirculation in septic shock? Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(10):1621-1624.

Dubin A, Pozo MO, Casabella CA, Pálizas F Jr, Murias G, Moseinco MC, Kanoore Edul VS, Pálizas F, Estenssoro E, Ince C. Increasing arterial blood pressure with norepinephrine does not improve microcirculatory blood flow: a prospective study. Crit Care. 2009;13(3):R92.

Putowski Z, Goldyn M, Pluta MP. Correlation between mean arterial pressure and capillary refill time in patients with septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Intensive Care Med. 2023;38(9):838-846.

Huang L, Huang Q, Ma W, Yang H. Understanding hemodynamic incoherence: mechanisms, phenotypes, and implications for treatment. Shock. 2025;63(3):342-350.

Datta R, Singh S. The endothelium or mitochondrial level therapy: new frontiers in sepsis? Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2025 10:502130.